passer le menu
Musée du Louvre logo, louvre.fr homepage

Overview
Curatorial Departments
Near Eastern Antiquities
Egyptian Antiquities
Greek, Etruscan, and Roman Antiquities
Islamic Art
Sculptures
Introduction
Selected Works
Latest Acquisitions
Traveling Works
Works in Focus
Bibliography
Timeline
Maps
Research Centers
Decorative Arts
Paintings
Prints and Drawings
Kaleidoscope
Databases


Home - Collection - Curatorial Departments - Sculptures - Selected Works - France, Renaissance

Sculptures : France, Renaissance

Attributed to Jean Cousin
Fragments from the tomb of Philippe Chabot (1480-1543), count of Brion, admiral of France
Recumbent effigy, put into place 17 June 1565
© Musée du Louvre/P. Philibert
Enlarge (new window)
Details
Technical information
Attributed to Jean Cousin
Fragments from the tomb of Philippe Chabot (1480-1543), count of Brion, admiral of France
Recumbent effigy, put into place 17 June 1565
Paris, church of the convent of the Celestines
Paris
Alabaster
H. 0.77 m; W. 1.58 m; D. 0.55 m
Seized during the French Revolution; Dépôt des Augustins; Musée des Monuments Français 1795-1816; allocated to the Louvre by Ministerial Decision, 6 July 1818
M.R. 1579, M.R. sup 175, M.L. 91, M.L. 92, R.F. 1192
Sculptures
Interactive floor plans
Author(s)
Montalbetti Valérie
first pageprevious page... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ...next pagelast page
Back to list Send to a friend (new window) Print (new window)
Add to My Album
 

Fragments from the tomb of Philippe Chabot (1480-1543), count of Brion, admiral of France

This tomb stands out among the funerary monuments of the French Renaissance for the rhythmic sculpture of the statue, and the extraordinary decorative ensemble to which it belonged (only a few fragments of which have survived, including a strange figure of Fortune).
Description

A tumultuous life


Philippe Chabot and the future King Francis I were brought up together and Chabot took part in the king's Italian campaigns - both were taken prisoner in Pavia. After a brilliant military career, the admiral returned to France where he became involved in court intrigue and fell into disgrace in 1541. Accused of embezzlement, he was imprisoned and his property confiscated. Through the intervention of the duchess of Etampes (mistress of Francis I), he was restored to the king's favor shortly before his death in 1543. Chabot was buried in Paris at the church of the Celestines - in the chapel of the prestigious Orléans family, because of his kinship with them. His son Léonor commissioned the tomb, but we know neither when nor by whom it was made. The effigy was put into place in 1565, and the epitaph probably written between 1570 and 1572.

A lifelike effigy, propped up on one elbow


The admiral is portrayed alive and dressed as a soldier wearing damascened armor, an emblazoned tabard, and the collar of the Order of Saint Michael. He has a whistle of command in his left hand. His attitude is noble and serene: he is lying on his side, one elbow resting on his helmet (his gauntlets are nearby). During the Renaissance, the traditional stiff poses of recumbent effigies gave way to more supple attitudes. The portrayal of the deceased as a living person suggests a desire to soften the representation of death; perhaps it also expresses a nostalgia for earthly life. This work represents a considerable innovation in the iconography of the recumbent effigy, yet the artist has retained the traditional attribute of the lion at the deceased's feet. The sculptor's identity is unknown, but the quality of the work suggests a consummate craftsman. The name of Pierre Bontemps has been put forward because of certain affinities with the statue of Charles de Maigny, but this suggestion is now contested: the effigy of Chabot has greater suppleness and grace, the face is more expressive. The powerful rhythm of this sculpture is the work of a superior artist.

An unprecedented decorative ensemble


The alabaster effigy was the central feature of a decorative ensemble that was unprecedented for a tomb. The statue was placed on a black marble sarcophagus, beneath which lay a prostrate figure of Fortune (laid low by the admiral's disgrace, or by his death?) A highly ornate, circular surround enclosed this ensemble, featuring the arms of the deceased and funerary genii holding upturned torches (symbolizing the passing of life). This innovative funerary design closely resembles Fontainebleau-style decoration, especially the fireplace in the queen's bedroom. An ornamentalist working on paper, with no regard for the conventions of funerary art, could have designed the monument, which would then have been made by sculptors. This would substantiate the claim of historian Jean Taveaux who, in the late 16th century, attributed the work to Jean Cousin, the famous artist (died c. 1560) who painted the Eva Prima Pandora (in the Louvre).

Documentation
Beaulieu Michèle, Description raisonnée des sculptures du musée
du Louvre, t. II Renaissance française, Paris, Éditions de la Réunion
des musées nationaux, 1978, pp. 78-81.
Bresc-Bautier Geneviève, "La sculpture funéraire de la Renaissance française au musée du Louvre : les limites de la restitution", Revue du Louvre, 1994, n 1, pp. 54-56.
Zerner Henri, L'Art de la Renaissance en France. L'invention du classicisme, Paris, 1996, pp. 246-250.

first pageprevious page... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ...next pagelast page
Back to list Back to top

Thematic Trail

Reception Pieces – Admission to the Royal Academy
Sculptors seeking admission to the French Royal Academy submitted works in plaster or clay for initial acceptance by a jury, and were then asked to execute a set piece (or "reception piece") in marble, within a specified time limit. Most of these reception pieces of are preserved in the Louvre.

All the thematic trails

Atlas Database

Base Atlas
© Musée du Louvre
Collection databases
View many of the 35,000 works on display, and consult the relevant technical information and accompanying commentaries by curators.

Resources

Explore the history of art and civilizations in the sections In-Depth Studies and A Closer Look. The Magazine takes a fresh, unconventional look at the museum and its collections.
In-depth studies
A closer look
Parallel